Chaos in Lamu after over 700 students are removed from bursary list

National NewsNews

The small coastal town of Lamu County was buzzing with fury as news spread about a controversial decision to strike off 700 students from the bursary list.

The bursary program was designed to support students from low-income families, helping them afford education and pursue their dreams.

However, the recent move had left many families outraged and feeling betrayed.

As the sun beat down on the dusty streets, groups of angry parents and students gathered outside the local government offices, demanding answers.

They waved banners and chanted slogans, calling for justice and accountability.

Among them was Fatma, a determined mother whose son had been counting on the bursary to continue his studies.

“I cannot believe they would do this to us,” she exclaimed, her voice trembling with emotion. “We rely on this support to send our children to school. Without it, how are they supposed to succeed?”

READ ALSO: Government increases bursary allocations for students

Why the learners were removed from bursary list

The decision to strike off the students had been made by a committee appointed by the county government, citing budget constraints and a need to prioritize funding for other projects.

However, many felt that this was just an excuse and that the real reason was corruption and mismanagement of funds.

“They have money for fancy cars and luxurious trips, but they can’t spare a dime for our children’s education,” one protester shouted, his fists clenched in anger.

However, local leaders attempted to calm the crowd, promising to review the decision and ensure that those affected would receive the support they deserved.

In the days that followed, the issue continued to dominate headlines, sparking a national debate on the importance of education funding and accountability.

Some residents saw it as a wake-up call to address systemic issues of corruption and inequality in the county.

READ ALSO: Gov’t starts crackdown on parents who have not taken their children to school 

As the sun set on another day of protests and unrest, one thing was clear: the fight for justice was far from over, and the voices of the marginalized would not be silenced.

Trending Now


Claims that the Finance Bill 2026 introduces a new tax on mitumba clothing have sparked heated debate, prompting Kenya Kwanza leaders to come out and explain what the proposed law actually says.  At the centre of the debate is Clause 31(a)(ix)(169), which deals with the Value Added Tax (VAT) treatment of worn clothing, commonly known as mitumba, sold within the country.   According to the clause, the Finance Bill proposes to simplify the VAT treatment of the mitumba sector by ensuring that VAT is charged only at the point of importation, while domestic sales of the same goods are exempt from further VAT.  In effect, VAT will be paid once when second-hand clothes enter Kenya. After that, traders selling the clothes in local markets will not be required to charge VAT on their sales.  The proposal is intended to reduce the compliance burden on traders by ensuring that VAT is collected at a clear and verifiable point. It also removes the possibility of double taxation, making business easier for traders while reducing paperwork and helping them retain more of their earnings.  Read Also Finance Bill heads to Ruto’s desk…


Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*we hate spam as much as you do

More From Author


Related Posts

See all >>

Latest Posts

See all >>